A-Level Results: Should You Ask for a Remark? A Complete Guide to Review of Marking in the UK
Introduction
A-level Results Day can be one of the most emotional days in a student's academic journey.
For some students, the results arrive exactly as expected. For others, there may be a surprising grade that seems inconsistent with their performance throughout the year. A student who was predicted an A* may receive an A. Another student may miss the grade required for their university offer by just a few marks.
At that point, one question often comes up:
“Should we ask for the paper to be remarked?”
The answer is not always straightforward.
In the UK, what parents often call a “remark” is generally part of a formal post-results service, such as a clerical re-check or a review of marking. These services are not simply a request for an examiner to “mark the paper again until the grade goes up”. There are specific procedures, deadlines and risks involved.
Most importantly, a review of marking can result in a student's mark and grade going up, staying the same, or going down. AQA explicitly states that there is no grade protection for a review of marking, while Pearson and OCR also state that marks or grades can change in either direction.
For international families preparing students for UK universities, understanding this process before Results Day is extremely important.
In Brief
A-level “remarking” is normally handled through formal post-results services offered by the awarding exam board.
A clerical re-check checks whether marks have been counted, recorded and processed correctly.
A review of marking involves another examiner reviewing the marking against the relevant mark scheme.
A review of marking can result in the mark or grade increasing, remaining unchanged, or decreasing.
Students whose university place depends on their result may be eligible for a priority review of marking, depending on the exam board.
Before requesting a review, students should ideally discuss the result with their subject teacher and, where appropriate, obtain access to the marked script.
Deadlines and fees vary according to the exam board, qualification and service, so families should always check the current information with the school or exam board.
What Does “Remarking” Actually Mean in the UK?
In everyday conversation, students and parents often use the word “remark” to describe any request to have an exam paper checked again.
However, the terminology used by UK awarding organisations is more precise.
Depending on the exam board, you may see terms such as:
Clerical re-check
Review of marking
Priority review of marking
Access to scripts
Reviews of Marking and Moderation (RoMM)
Service 1
Service 2
Priority Service 2
The terminology is different, but the underlying principle is similar.
The purpose is not to give a student extra marks simply because the student or parent disagrees with the result. Instead, the exam board checks whether the examination was processed and marked according to its procedures.
For example, AQA's clerical re-check checks that all pages have been marked, marks have been counted correctly and the final result matches the marks recorded on the paper.
A review of marking goes further. AQA explains that a second examiner reviews the paper to identify genuine marking errors or unreasonable application of the mark scheme, while the service also includes the relevant clerical checks.
Pearson similarly describes its review of marking service as an additional check of the marking of externally assessed components, including clerical checks and a review by a senior examiner.
So, when a parent says, “Can we get the A-level paper remarked?”, the more accurate question is:
“Which post-results service is appropriate for this student's situation?”
That distinction matters.
The Two Main Options: Clerical Re-Check vs Review of Marking
1. Clerical Re-Check
A clerical re-check is the simpler of the two.
The purpose is essentially to check whether something went wrong in the administrative processing of the examination.
This can include checking that:
all parts of the paper were marked;
marks were correctly recorded;
marks were correctly added;
the final result was calculated correctly;
relevant procedures were followed.
For example, AQA describes its clerical re-check as checking that all pages were marked, all marks were counted and the result corresponds with the marks recorded.
Pearson's Service 1 similarly checks clerical procedures, including whether all parts of the paper were marked, marks were recorded or added correctly and grade boundaries were applied appropriately.
This type of service is therefore useful when the concern is primarily about whether the marks have been processed correctly, rather than whether the examiner's academic judgement was appropriate.
2. Review of Marking
A review of marking is more substantial.
The examination paper is reviewed again by another examiner or senior examiner to determine whether the mark scheme has been applied correctly.
This does not mean the examiner simply “marks everything from scratch” with the aim of finding extra marks.
Instead, the review considers whether the original marking was consistent with the agreed mark scheme and whether there was a genuine marking error.
OCR describes its Service 2 review as checking that the agreed mark scheme has been applied correctly and notes that the service includes the clerical checks included in Service 1.
Pearson uses the terminology Review of Marking and Moderation (RoMM) for its post-results services and similarly allows additional checks where a centre has concerns about a candidate's result.
Which one should a student choose?
This is where professional judgement becomes important.
If the issue appears to be an administrative or calculation problem, a clerical re-check may be appropriate.
If there is a genuine concern about how an examiner applied the mark scheme, a review of marking may be more relevant.
But the decision should not be based simply on:
“The grade is lower than we expected, so let's request a remark.”
A stronger approach is to ask:
How far is the student from the next grade boundary?
What does the student's teacher think about the marking?
Is there a realistic academic reason to believe the marking may have been inconsistent?
Does the grade affect a university offer?
What is the risk if the mark falls?
These questions should be considered before submitting the request.
Can a Remark Make the Grade Go Down?
Yes. This is one of the most important points for parents to understand.
A review of marking does not come with automatic grade protection.
AQA explicitly states that a student's mark or subject grade may be lowered, confirmed or raised as a result of a review of marking.
OCR also requires candidate consent because marks and grades may be lowered.
This means a student should not request a review simply because they are disappointed with the result.
Imagine a student receives an A and is only a few marks below the A* boundary.
It may be tempting to think:
“We are already close to A*, so there is nothing to lose.”
That is not necessarily true.
If the original mark is reviewed and some marks are removed, the student could remain at A or potentially fall to a lower grade if the revised mark crosses another boundary.
The exact consequences depend on the student's mark, the grade boundaries and the exam board's procedures.
This is why looking only at the letter grade is not enough.
The First Step Should Usually Be Looking at the Marked Script
One of the most sensible steps is to obtain access to the student's examination script before deciding whether a review of marking is appropriate.
This allows the subject teacher to examine what the student actually wrote and consider whether there appears to be a reasonable basis for questioning the original marking.
AQA, for example, provides access to scripts and specifically recommends that students without a pending university place can request a priority copy of the marked paper to help decide whether a clerical re-check or review of marking is appropriate.
This is particularly valuable for essay-based subjects.
For subjects such as:
Economics
History
English Literature
English Language
Politics
Geography
Business
Psychology
the teacher may be able to examine the student's answers and identify whether there is a plausible marking issue.
However, this does not mean that a teacher can guarantee that a review will produce a higher mark.
The purpose is to make a more informed decision.
A practical approach
A sensible sequence is often:
Results → Check marks and grade boundary → Discuss with teacher → Access script if appropriate → Decide whether to request review → Submit through school
This is much better than immediately requesting a remark based solely on disappointment.
Important point for university applicants
There is one major exception to the “look at the script first” approach.
If the student's university place depends on the outcome, the priority review process may have a much earlier deadline.
For AQA's June 2026 A-level series, the priority review deadline is 20 August 2026, while the deadline for a standard review is 24 September 2026.
Therefore, a student who has missed a university offer may not have the luxury of waiting for every possible step.
The school, subject teacher and university admissions team may need to be involved very quickly.
 |
| Comparison of A-level clerical re-check and review of marking in the UK |
What If the Student Misses a University Offer?
This is where the timing of a review becomes particularly important.
Suppose a student has a university offer requiring:
A*AA
but receives:
AAA
The immediate reaction may be to request a review of marking.
However, there are several things to consider simultaneously.
First: Is the university offer actually lost?
Not necessarily.
UCAS decisions can depend on the exact circumstances, and universities may sometimes accept students who narrowly miss their offer.
Students should therefore check their UCAS status and communicate with the university where appropriate.
Second: Is there a realistic possibility of a grade change?
This is where the subject teacher's judgement becomes important.
A student who is one or two marks below a grade boundary may have a different situation from a student who is 15 or 20 marks away.
But even being close to a boundary does not automatically mean that a review will change the grade.
Third: Is there a deadline for a priority review?
If the student's university place depends on the outcome, the exam board may provide a priority service.
AQA, for example, states that its priority review is available for AS and A-level students whose university or higher education place depends on the outcome.
OCR also provides a priority Service 2 for AS and A Levels in the June series.
This is why Results Day is not the time to start researching the process for the first time.
Families should know in advance who at the school is responsible for post-results enquiries and what the relevant exam board's procedures are.
Deadlines, Fees and Exam Boards: Why You Must Check the Details
There is no single universal “UK remark deadline”.
The deadline depends on:
exam board;
qualification;
exam series;
type of service;
whether the service is priority;
whether the student has a university place pending.
For example, AQA lists the June 2026 A-level priority review deadline as 20 August and the standard review deadline as 24 September.
The school document used as an example for 2026 also shows the same distinction between a priority review for university-dependent cases and a standard review later in the post-results period.
The fees also differ between exam boards and services.
For example, the 2026 information provided by one UK school shows different fees for AQA, Pearson, OCR and WJEC, illustrating why parents should not assume that every “remark” costs the same.
Therefore, rather than relying on an old article or a previous year's fee table, families should check the current information directly with the relevant school or awarding organisation.
The terminology can also vary.
The important point is not memorising every service code.
It is understanding what is being checked and what risk the student is taking.
How Should Parents Decide Whether a Review Is Worthwhile?
This is probably the most practical question.
There is no universal rule such as “always remark if you are one mark away”.
Instead, I recommend looking at the situation from four angles.
1. Distance from the grade boundary
The closer the student's mark is to the next grade boundary, the more reasonable it may be to investigate.
But proximity alone is not sufficient.
A student who is one mark below a boundary is not automatically likely to gain a mark through a review.
2. Teacher's professional judgement
A subject teacher who knows the student's work can often provide valuable context.
For example, if the student's internal assessments, mock examinations and predicted grade have consistently been significantly higher, that may justify a closer look.
However, predicted grades are not evidence that an examiner made a mistake.
The actual examination response remains the central piece of evidence.
3. University consequences
This is critical.
A one-grade difference may have very different consequences depending on the university offer.
If the grade has no effect on the student's next step, there may be less reason to accept the financial cost and risk of a review.
If the grade determines whether the student can take up a university place, the situation becomes much more urgent.
4. Downside risk
Finally, ask:
“What happens if the mark goes down?”
This question is often overlooked.
If the student is sitting comfortably within a grade and a small downward movement would not affect anything important, the risk may be manageable.
But if the student is close to a lower boundary, the decision needs much more careful consideration.
A-Level Remarking Is Not a Strategy for “Chasing” a Higher Grade
One misunderstanding I often see among international families is the belief that a review of marking is essentially a second chance to persuade the examiner to award more marks.
That is not how the system works.
The purpose is quality assurance.
The examiner is looking at whether the marking was consistent with the mark scheme and whether a genuine marking error or unreasonable application of the mark scheme occurred.
This is particularly important because A-level marking is designed to be standardised across thousands of candidates.
A review is therefore not a negotiation.
A parent cannot argue that:
“Other students got higher grades.”
Nor is a teacher's prediction enough to establish that the original examiner made a mistake.
The question is much narrower:
Was the student's work marked correctly according to the relevant assessment criteria?
Understanding this distinction helps families approach the process realistically.
What International Students and Parents Often Miss
For international families, there are a few additional issues worth highlighting.
The school usually handles the request
Students generally do not simply email an exam board themselves and ask for a remark.
The request is normally submitted through the school or college's exams officer.
Pearson, for example, states that students should speak to their school or college exams officer, who submits the review request on their behalf.
The school will therefore play an important role in:
checking the result;
advising on the appropriate service;
obtaining candidate consent;
submitting the request;
receiving the outcome.
Candidate consent is important
Because the result can potentially decrease, candidate consent is required.
AQA specifically states that student consent must be obtained before submitting a review of marking.
This is not merely an administrative formality.
The student should understand that the result is not protected.
University communication should not be forgotten
If the student has missed a university offer, the review should not be treated as the only action.
The student may also need to communicate with the university and consider the available UCAS options.
A review of marking and university admissions are related, but they are separate processes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1. Can an A-level grade go down after a remark?
Yes. A review of marking does not guarantee that the grade will stay the same or increase. Marks and grades can go up, remain unchanged or go down.
Q2. Is it worth requesting a remark if the student is only one mark away from the next grade?
It may be worth investigating, but being one mark away does not automatically mean the review will result in a higher grade. The student's script, marking and university circumstances should all be considered.
Q3. Should we always request the marked script first?
Often this is a sensible approach, especially when there is no immediate university deadline. However, students whose university place depends on the result may need to use a priority service before there is time for a lengthy decision process.
Q4. Does every exam board use the word “remark”?
No. Different awarding organisations use different terminology. AQA refers to reviews of marking, Pearson uses Reviews of Marking and Moderation (RoMM), while OCR uses service numbers such as Service 1 and Service 2.
Q5. Can students apply directly to the exam board?
Usually, the request is made through the school or college's exams officer. Pearson explicitly directs students to their school or college exams officer for this process.
Q6. What if the student needs the result for university admission?
The student should act quickly. Some exam boards provide a priority review of marking specifically for cases where a university or higher education place depends on the result.
Q7. How long does a review take?
The timescale varies by exam board and service. For example, AQA currently states up to 20 calendar days for a standard review and up to 15 calendar days for a priority review.
Conclusion: Don't Treat a Remark as a Gamble
An unexpected A-level result can be stressful, particularly when a student's university plans are affected.
But the best response is not to panic and immediately request a remark.
The UK system provides a structured post-results process that allows students to have administrative checks and marking reviewed where appropriate.
The key is making the decision based on evidence.
Look at the student's marks. Understand the grade boundaries. Speak to the subject teacher. Obtain the script where appropriate. Consider the university consequences. Check the deadline and fee for the specific exam board.
And, most importantly, understand the risk.
A review of marking is designed to correct genuine errors, not simply to give a disappointed student another opportunity to gain marks.
For international families, this process can feel particularly complicated because the terminology, deadlines and procedures may be unfamiliar. Having someone who understands both the UK examination system and the university admissions process can make the decision much more straightforward.
At UKO Academy, our work with international students goes beyond simply preparing students for examinations. We help families understand how GCSE and A-level results fit into the wider UK education and university admissions pathway, including UCAS planning and preparation for competitive UK universities.
